Posted on

The Concept And Characteristics Of Leadership Business Essay

A leader is interpreted as person who sets way in an attempt and influences people to follow that way. How they set that way and influence people depends on a assortment of factors that we ‘ll see subsequently on below. To truly grok the “ district ” of leading, you should briefly scan some of the major theories, notice assorted manners of leading and reexamine some of the suggested traits and features that leaders should hold. The remainder of this library should assist you in this respect.

Concept of Leadership

It ‘s the procedure where a individual influence is over other individuals in order to admit a set of aims ; the leader leads an organisation in a proper manner, besides leaders take duty of this undertaking utilizing its leader accomplishments. In other words, a individual can be in charge of an endeavor but that does non do it a leader.

Larson and LaFasto ( 1989 ) looked in the opposite way by questioning first-class squads to derive penetrations as to what enabled them to work to such a high grade. They came off with the undermentioned decisions:

A clear elevating end – they have a vision

Consequences goaded construction – visions have a concern end

Competent squad members with right figure and mix

Unified committedness – they are a squad, non a group

A collaborative clime – aligned towards a common intent

High criterions of excellence – they have group norms

Principled leading – the cardinal driver of excellence

External support – they have equal resources


1-Articulate Your Personal Values as a Leader – One of the first things a leader should make, is to somehow joint your personal values as a leader. This might look fiddling, or even irrelevant to some. However, this is of import for a really simple, basic ground – we work with people. Human existences are non cold, rational zombis. We are people with emotions, likes and disfavors, biass, and tonss of other material.

Clarify your personal values. This can be done every bit merely as naming everyone together, give a short, speech. Its adequate to demo that you are human plenty to pass on with them. It is non an chance to regal them with your sketch. It is a clip to state “ Thank you, squad. Hope we can work together good. ”

2-Putting Action Into Words – when you Act, your values shine through. So, be careful what you say. Your words are a testimony more powerful than you know. Your actions so go the concluding straw that will either seal that truth or interrupt the semblance you try to make. If you are constructing up new wonts, if you are seeking a new tact, all right. But ne’er mis-represent that these are your already your values ; your words, if non seen in action, average nil.

3-Have A Vision – This vision should non be confused with your personal values. It should be congruous with those values, but your vision should hold a direct impact on either your concern, your staff.

A vision is clear. Leaderships who claim to hold a vague, slightly phantasmagoric “ vision ” and encourages everyone to travel with the flow, is likely doing things up as they go. If you are non able to be precise and clear, that is non a vision ; it ‘s a dream. Some leaders ne’er live to see their vision fulfilled. But great leaders have ever articulated clear visions and they all seem to cognize precisely how to make it.

4-Leadership accomplishment – A existent leader demands to be crisp. Leader should hold toned all his senses to flawlessness that he should be able to feel even the slightest of alterations in state of affairs. One who is of course sensitive to issues will decidedly be a good hearer and perceiver. Merely if the leader listens to the demands of the followings and observes and understands them, he can do wise determinations on whom to swear and whom non to swear. Delegation is a another really of import facet of a successful leader. One can non take up all things on his shoulder and be successful. If merely a leader is crisp plenty to delicate expeditiously, he will hold any opportunity to win.


1. Autocratic leading

Autocratic leading is an utmost signifier of transactional leading, where leaders have absolute power over their workers or squad. Staff and squad members have small chance to do suggestions, even if these would be in the squad ‘s or the organisation ‘s best involvement.

Most people tend to resent being treated like this. Therefore, bossy leading normally leads to high degrees of absenteeism and staff turnover. For some everyday and unskilled occupations, the manner can stay effectual because the advantages of control may outweigh the disadvantages.

2. Charismatic leading

A magnetic leading manner can look similar to transformational leading, because these leaders inspire tonss of enthusiasm in their squads and are really energetic in driving others frontward. However, magnetic leaders can be given to believe more in themselves than in their squads, and this creates a hazard that a undertaking, or even an full organisation, might fall in if the leader leaves. In the eyes of the followings, success is straight connected to the presence of the magnetic leader. As such, magnetic leading carries great duty, and it needs a long-run committedness from the leader.

3. Democratic leading or participative leading

Although democratic leaders make the concluding determinations, they invite other members of the squad to lend to the decision-making procedure. This non merely increases occupation satisfaction by affecting squad members, but it besides helps to develop people ‘s accomplishments. Team members feel in control of their ain fate, so they ‘re motivated to work hard by more than merely a fiscal reward.The attack can be most suited when working as a squad is indispensable, and when quality is more of import than velocity to market or productiveness.

4. Task-Oriented leading

Highly task-oriented leaders focus merely on acquiring the occupation done, and they can be rather bossy. They actively define the work and the functions required, set constructions in topographic point, program, form, and proctor. However, because task-oriented leaders do n’t be given to believe much about the wellbeing of their squads, this attack can endure many of the defects of bossy leading, with troubles in motivation and retaining staff.

Two most Influential Business leader

Warren Buffet

Superior concern leader and American investor Warren Buffett is frequently called “ Oracle of Omaha ” or the “ Sage of Omaha ” and altruist. ( Wikipedia, 2007 ) Buffett is the CEO, and the biggest stockholder of the Berkshire Hathaway Company. Buffet ‘s has an estimated current net worth of about $ 52 billion in US financess. Forbes Magazine ranks Buffett the 3rd richest individual in the universe in September 2007 behind Carlos Slim and Bill Gates. Warren Buffett is known for his economical and apparent life style. Buffett still lives in the same Omaha.

Warren counter is a true leader where his leading makes a difference in the universe. Leadership is really much related to alter and Warren Buffett has the capablenesss of leading alteration to suit the changing universe. Warren Buffett has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to map read in the irregular Waterss of alteration. The writers of this paper believe non. Experience and research has shown small grounds that an person who comes to power is a “ born leader. ” Warren Buffett took the falls that any other leader has to take. Warren Buffett learned from his errors and turned his errors into a positive thing. Warren Buffett portions his leading at all organisational degrees and Buffett is empowered to portion leading duties. In the universe of concern, many rubrics related to leading functions are actively used in concern and Warren Buffett wears those rubrics to do him effectual in multiple leading places in concern. Differentiation between good leading and good direction is made frequently. Directors are made to be organisational, accountants and budgeters. Warren Buffett has leading in all three sections and one must hold these traits to be a good concern leader.

When Warren Buffett negotiations, people listen. Warren Buffett can direct a message through an unfastened door and does non hold to force the message through a wall. Warren Buffet ‘s is a ego sceptered leader, because he is loyal, sets ends, plans a scheme for accomplishment, and corsets committed until he accomplishes his intent. Up to day of the month, he is the greatest stockbroker of all-time. He is a really conservative investor that prefers to put in companies that sell name trade name merchandises that he uses. For illustration, Coca-Cola, Gillette Razors, See ‘s Candy, Gulfstream Jet, and GEICO are the major companies he invested in.

The personality of Warren Buffett ties to the Social Cognitive Level, because he tries to understand and do sense of other people. He observes the differences in societal cognition when covering with people. Social knowledge refers to doing sense of ourselves, others, and how the information is used. Warren investing picks were successful, because he conditioned his the manner he processed information, picks, and outlooks.

Lakshmi mittal

Mittal Steel is a planetary steel manufacturer with operations in 14 countries.Mittal pioneered the development of incorporate mini-mills and the usage of direct reduced Fe or “ DRI ” as a bit replacement for steelmaking and led the consolidation procedure of the planetary steel industry. Mittal Steel is the largest steelworker in the universe, with cargos of 42.1 million dozenss of steel and net incomes of over $ 22 billion in 2004.

There are many steel companies throughout the universe, but Mittal does things wholly different than the competition. His monetary values are competitory, his steel is stronger, and he ‘s able to reliably transport his merchandise anyplace in the universe. This manner of making concern helps to maintain his company turning and bring forthing monolithic gross because of his good leading manner.

Mittal was awarded Fortune magazine ‘s “ European Businessman of the Year 2004 ” and besides “ Steelmaker of the Year ” in 1996 by New Steel, and the “ Willy Korf Steel Vision Award ” in 1998, for outstanding vision, entrepreneurship, leading and success in planetary steel development from Metal Market and PaineWeber ‘s World Steel Dynamics. In 2002, he was involved in a political dirt with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, when a contribution he made to the Labour party led to Blair ‘s intercession in a concern trade prefering Mittal. It was announced subsequently that he donated ?2 million to the Labour Party.Also carry oning charitable activity at his place town in 2010, Forbes magazine listed Mittal the universe ‘s 5th richest individual with personal wealth of US $ 28.7 billion. His wealth has grown by over US $ 9 billion compared to 2009 and is up 3 topographic points in the Forbes ranking.

Today his chief focal point is on eastern Europe, where the steel industries are still being privatised. In 2001, he notoriously enlisted the aid of Tony Blair to purchase Ispat Sidex in Romania, crushing Gallic rival Usinor – which subsequently became portion of Arcelor – in the process.Lakshmi mittal acquire the milepost through his good leading accomplishment.

Part B

Poor CommunicationA

communicating is cardinal to a strong concern relationship.A This can be the relationship between concern and client, or, every bit as of import, the internal relationships among different employees within the company.A Communication can be improved in virtually every workplace, no affair the industry or size.A After all, it is the lone manner for information to efficaciously distribute throughout the concern so that everybody can be informed to the grade that they required to properly accomplish their ends.

Other leaders may state one thing with their words and another with their actions-frequently referred to as “ do what I say, non what I do ” . Such disagreements between words and actions raise inquiries as to the leader ‘s unity and more significantly, his or her credibleness within the organisation.

Sometimes a leader may make up one’s mind to maintain things secret, experiencing that he or she is unable to swear his or her staff. Some leaders may make up one’s mind that their place is dependent upon their cognition, and that they therefore can non portion any cognition with others for fright of doing themselves disused.

In some organisations, determinations on forces motions are made by a group of senior directors who are tasked with detecting all employees throughout the organisation, comparing their strengths and failings and their suitableness for any places which may go available. The information gathered by this group is carefully guarded-restricted to the group members themselves and the senior figured within the Human Resources section.

Such a close policy on sequence planning leads to an uneven distribution of cognition throughout the organisation, to resentment from staff who feel they have been difficult done by, and on more than one juncture when a corporate restructure came about, to the best and brightest go forthing the organisation because they either had no thought how much they were valued, or they had received inside information that they had been overlooked for publicity for pathetic grounds.

Office political relations

Office political relations “ is the usage of one ‘s single or assigned power within an employing organisation for the intent of obtaining advantages beyond one ‘s legitimate authorization. Those advantages may include entree to touchable assets, or intangible benefits such as position or pseudo-authority that influences the behaviour of others. Both persons and groups may prosecute in Office Politics. ” Office political relation has besides been described as “ merely how power gets worked out on a practical, daily footing. ”

Office political relations differs from office chitchat in that people take parting in office political relations do so with the aim of deriving advantage, whereas chitchat can be a strictly societal activity. However, both activities are extremely related to each other. Office chitchat is frequently used by an person to put themselves at a point where they can command the flow of information and hence addition maximal advantage.

This complete deficiency of communicating is broken merely when either:

office political relations dictate that it would be good for an person to “ leak ” some information from the group ; or

An person within the HR section tells one of their friends about the group ‘s appraisals because it ‘s a juicy piece of chitchat.

The most important mentality difference was theA ‘rational systems ‘ position of the turning away group and theA ‘human systems’A position of the two active political groups.

There is besides aA major mindset difference between the two active political groups. There is the win-lose, non ethical, upward focal point, self involvement, competitory, personal addition mentality of the negative political relations group, versus the win-win, ethical, organisation focal point, enlightened self involvement, collaborative, best involvements of the concern mentality of the positive political relations group.

The positive political relations group have the higher invention success rates and higher success factor indexs in footings of public presentation, and publicity. They are more likely to be viewed as leaders than the other two groups.

At the root of office political relations is the issue of use which can go on in any relationship where one or more of the parties involved use indirect agencies to accomplish their ends. In the workplace, persons have an inducement to accomplish their ends at the disbursal of their co-workers, where resources are limited. For illustration, if six people apply for one publicity, they might anticipate the choice to be made strictly on virtue. Where one of the people believes that this would set them at a disadvantage, they may utilize other agencies of coercion or influence to set themselves into an advantageous place. When the people being manipulated Begin to speak to each other straight, or when other grounds comes to light such as fiscal consequences, the operator will hold an account ready but will already be be aftering their issue, because they would instead remain in control than face a disclosure which exposes their behavior.

The purpose of office political relations or use in the workplace is non ever increased wage or a publicity. Often, the end may merely be greater power or control for its ain terminal ; or to disrepudiate a rival. The operator will frequently accomplish calling or personal ends by co-opting as many co-workers as possible into their programs, beef uping their ain place by guaranting that they will be the last individual to be accused of any error, because they ally themselves with everyone, altering sides to accommodate their ain personal, concealed docket.

Office political relations is a major issue in concern because the persons who manipulate their on the job relationships consume clip and resources for their ain addition at the disbursal of the squad or company.

Team work

Teamwork is indispensable for viing in today ‘s planetary sphere, where single flawlessness is non every bit desirable as a high degree of corporate public presentation. In cognition based endeavors, squads are the norm instead than the exclusion. A critical characteristic of these squads is that they have a important grade of authorization, or decision-making authorization. There are many different sorts of squads: top direction squads, focused undertaking forces, autonomous squads, coincident technology squads, product/service development and/or launch squads, quality betterment squads, and so on.

First, you should ever do your outlooks of your squad members clear. You can carry through this with a thorough and elaborate occupation description followed by personal treatments for elucidation. Second, when deputing, ever empower each squad member. Make certain to give the squad member the authorization to do and transport out determinations that are required. Furthermore, ever support and endorse up the determinations made by the squad member. If you disagree with their determination, alternatively of castigating or censuring, coach the employee and assist them to understand your logical thinking.

Politically right linguistic communication

Most organisations are incognizant of their civilization as it pertains to moralss. Most employees would inquire their leading to specify ethical behaviour, and today ‘s leading would avoid such a inquiry or give what they perceive is a politically right reply. Dr. Ergun Caner ( 2004 ) said that, “ If something is politically right it is normally morally corrupt ” . What he meant is, we are so haunted with the right response that we allow corruptness to be that may hold an impact on others to avoid personal deduction. so as a leader one should be careful when turn toing groups or speaking about others, uselanguage that would non do any person of any demographic ( societal or cultural ) to experience excluded, offended or diminished.


Leadership is a necessary portion of any organisation, and directors who combine leading accomplishments with direction traits offer organisations enhanced productiveness and better long-run chances than those directors who are non leaders. However, the line between leader and director is unclear: leaders are non needfully good directors, and directors do non ever possess leading features. Both leaders and directors are required in successful organisations. Leaderships provide the long-run vision for the organisation, while directors possess the endowment for seting that vision into concrete action and pull offing daily activities that accomplish that action. The type of leading that succeeds in any organisation is, to some grade, determined by the organisational civilization in which the company operates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.